State agencies have the power to give out licenses to businesses and professions, but they can also take them away if there is an immediate danger to the public. This is called an emergency process. Agencies can also take immediate action in situations that don’t involve licenses, like destroying citrus groves because of citrus canker. When a client receives an emergency order, a lawyer needs to know what to file and where to get a review of the order. There are two types of emergency orders: immediate final orders (IFOs) and emergency license suspension orders (ESOs). IFOs are issued when there is an immediate danger to the public and the agency needs to take action right away. Agencies have to follow specific rules when issuing emergency orders. If a government agency wants to take emergency action to suspend, restrict, or limit a license, they have to have a good reason. They need to show that there is an immediate and serious threat to public health, safety, or welfare. They also need to prove that specific harm will happen if they don’t act right away. The action they take has to be fair, and they can only do what’s necessary to protect the public. If they do take emergency action, they have to explain why they did it and provide reasons for why it’s fair. An Emergency Suspension Order (ESO) is a serious remedy that an agency can use to stop harm, and they have to explain why other less harsh options, like probation or a fine, won’t work. The reasons for the ESO must be clearly stated and based on specific facts. If a license is affected by an ESO, the agency has to give the licensee a chance to argue against it in a hearing. Both ESOs and Interim Final Orders (IFOs) can be reviewed by a district court of appeal. Appeals have to follow specific rules, and not all options for appeal may be available right away. In Florida, certain agency decisions can be reviewed by a court if someone disagrees with them. The type of review depends on the specific type of decision made by the agency. For some decisions, a person can file a notice of appeal to start the review process, while for others, they may need to file a petition for review. It can be tricky to figure out which type of review is needed, but state agencies are required to give information about how to appeal their decisions. However, this information is not always correct. In most cases, the review process is handled by the First District Court of Appeal in Tallahassee. If you want to challenge a decision made by a government agency, you need to do it within 30 days of the decision. You can do this by filing a notice of appeal with the agency clerk or by filing a petition for review with the district court of appeal. If you want to stop the decision from being enforced while you appeal, you can ask for a stay. In some cases, you can get a stay as a matter of right, but in other cases, you may need to ask the court for one. If your license is being suspended or revoked, the rules for getting a stay are different. If an agency says that giving someone a break will likely cause harm, the court will quickly consider the request for a break. To speed things up, the request should say it’s urgent. The agency has to prove that not taking immediate action will cause a lot of harm. Although the rules don’t say that the person asking for a break can respond to the agency’s arguments, it’s fair for them to have a chance to do so. It’s best to include as much info as possible in the request to avoid needing to respond later. There are no special requirements for asking for a break in a different kind of case, but it’s still important to show why it’s necessary. Once a stay is issued, it will remain in effect until a final decision is made, unless the agency asks for it to be changed because of new information that shows it could harm the public. If a court finds that an appeal is frivolous or an abuse of the process, they can make the losing party pay the winning party’s legal fees. Parties can ask for oral arguments, but the court doesn’t have to grant them. If a party thinks the court missed something in its decision, they can ask for a rehearing within 15 days. After the district court makes a decision, the clerk of the court is supposed to issue a mandate, which basically means to officially order the decision to be carried out. This mandate will either agree with the agency’s decision or tell the agency to do something different based on the court’s decision. If someone asks for more time to think about the decision, the mandate won’t be issued until that extra time is up. In cases of emergency orders, if a temporary stop on the decision was allowed, the mandate will cancel that stop.
One problem with the laws about emergency orders is that they don’t say how quickly a hearing should happen after the order is given. The law says that the agency should start the process quickly, but doesn’t say exactly how quickly. This process is similar to the process for temporary court orders, but it doesn’t give the same protection. If someone is ordered to do or not do something right away without being told first, they can ask for a hearing within 5 days. But for orders from government agencies, there’s often no opportunity for a quick hearing. This means that someone who gets an emergency order against them could suffer for a long time, even if it turns out the order was wrong. And the government can’t be held responsible for any damage caused by the wrong order. There’s also a problem with different rules for different types of emergency orders. The best solution would be to have a quick hearing for any type of emergency order that affects a license. State agencies have a lot of power in issuing orders that affect people’s licenses and businesses. It’s really important to make sure they don’t issue these orders without good reasons and proper procedures in place. If they make a mistake and issue an order when they shouldn’t have, it can cause a lot of damage. For example, if they wrongly suspend a license, it can still be fixed later, but the damage from the suspension can be really bad. And if they take immediate action and it turns out to be a mistake, it might be too late to fix the harm it caused. So, the courts need to make sure the state agencies follow the rules and don’t abuse their power. This is a list of court cases in Florida. It includes cases like Haire v. Florida Department of Agriculture and Meszaros v. Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. It also mentions different court rules and procedures for handling administrative law cases. Finally, it explains the purpose of a due process hearing in the context of a temporary injunction. This article is written by the Appellate Practice Section of a legal association, and it talks about the qualifications and roles of two attorneys. One attorney is experienced and specializes in appellate practice, while the other is an associate with a strong academic background. The article is meant to inform and educate members of the legal community.
Source: https://www.floridabar.org/the-florida-bar-journal/appeals-of-state-agency-immediate-final-orders-and-emergency-suspension-orders/
Leave a Reply