Author: Elf
-
The Proverbial Get Out of Jail Free Card The Ninth Circuit’s Treatment of Addiction Under Hernandez v. Hughes Missile Systems Co.
Joel used cocaine at work and was given the choice to quit instead of getting fired. His former employer has a policy not to rehire people who were fired or quit for breaking company rules, but Joel sued under the Americans with Disabilities Act because he has an addiction. Hernandez applied for a job at…
-
Burdens of Proof of Reasonableness and Undue Hardship Under Titles I, II, and III of the Americans With Disabilities Act, Part I
For almost 20 years, the McDonnell Douglas case has provided guidelines for proving discrimination in employment under the Civil Rights Act. These guidelines have also been used for discrimination cases under the Americans With Disabilities Act, which requires accommodating disabled individuals. However, the burden shifting in McDonnell Douglas doesn’t work well for cases where accommodation…
-
Burdens of Proof of Reasonableness and Undue Hardship Under Titles I, II, and III of the Americans With Disabilities Act, Part II
The previous article talked about who has to prove what in a case where someone is asking for an accommodation under the ADA. This article focuses on what the person asking for the accommodation has to prove and gives some guidelines for how the burden of proof is divided between the parties. In one court…
-
Corporate Misdeeds and Their Impact Upon Enforceability of Executive Employment Agreement Indemnification Provisions
“The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff in the case against Company A for breach of contract. The plaintiff was awarded damages and attorney’s fees. This is a significant win for the plaintiff and sets a precedent for future similar cases.” Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan says that corporate greed has caused problems with…
-
The Family Medical Leave Act Ten Years Later
The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) turned 10 recently. It requires bigger employers to give employees up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave for serious health issues or having a baby. There have been lots of legal battles about this law. This article looks at important court decisions about the FMLA and what they…
-
Classification and Valuation of Damages Under Title VII
The starting point for valuing liability in an employment case is to review the laws that define and limit the relief available. Title VII is one of the most challenging statutes, with added elements of damages that complicate the valuation process. It’s important to understand front pay and back pay, which are not subject to…
-
Recent Developments in the Use of Summary Judgment to Resolve Employment Discrimination Cases
For employment lawyers, the way discrimination cases are resolved has changed a lot in the past few years. Summary judgment, which means a case can be decided without a trial, is now used a lot more often. This means it’s really important for lawyers to quickly figure out if a discrimination case has a good…
-
Successfully Defending Employees in Noncompete and Trade Secret Litigation
Noncompete agreements are becoming more common as companies try to protect their business interests from employees moving to competitors. These agreements can have serious consequences for employees, so it’s important to have a lawyer review the agreement before signing it. In Florida, noncompete agreements must be in writing and signed by the employee to be…
-
Mental Examinations In Federal Employment Litigation
The law recognizes that some emotional distress is part of life, and only intervenes if it’s really bad. In employment lawsuits, people often claim emotional distress and the defendant may want access to their medical records. They might also ask for a mental examination to see if the distress is real. As a lawyer, you…
-
Desert Palace, Inc. v. CostaDoes McDonnell Douglas Survive?
Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act has been around for almost 40 years and has been the subject of many court cases. A recent Supreme Court decision called Desert Palace, Inc. v. Costa has changed the way discrimination in the workplace is proven. Before this, the Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins case set out…
-
The Unrelated Works Exception to Workers’ Compensation Immunity
This is a legal case where a student sued their school for not providing accommodations for their disability. The court ruled in favor of the student and said the school had to make changes to help them. In Florida, if an employee gets hurt on the job, they can’t sue their employer for negligence. But…
-
Florida’s New Minimum Wage Provision: An Overview of the Amendment to the Florida Constitution
In 2004, Floridians voted to add a minimum wage provision to the Florida Constitution, which increased the minimum wage to $6.15 per hour. The amendment also required annual adjustments to the wage based on inflation. This means that employers in Florida have to pay their employees at least this amount per hour. If someone thinks…
-
Ouellette v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., and Florida’s Minimum Wage Law: Are Class Actions for Minimum Wage on Florida’s Horizon?
In 2004, Florida’s voters and the First Circuit Court of Appeal made it easier for workers to sue their employers for not paying them enough money. The court ruled that a group of workers could sue Wal-Mart together, even though each worker had different damages. Around the same time, Florida also changed its constitution to…
-
Outrunning Contractual Noncompete Undertakings: Does the 11th Circuit’s Palmer & Cay Decision Offer Earlybird Specials for Florida Forum Shoppers?
In the case Palmer & Cay, a court ruled that a noncompete agreement in Florida could potentially be unenforceable in Florida because of a decision made in a Georgia court. This seems unfair and conflicting with other court decisions. However, it’s possible that a Florida court could still have the final say on whether the…
-
Faragher v. City of Boca Raton: A Seven-year Retrospective
The Faragher defense is a way for employers to avoid being held responsible for discrimination by their employees. In order to use this defense, the employer has to prove that they had a good system in place to prevent discrimination and that the employee didn’t take advantage of it. Even though some people were worried…
-
IBP v. Alvarez
The U.S. Supreme Court recently decided that employees must be paid for the time they spend putting on and taking off protective gear at work. They also have to be paid for the time they spend walking to and from their work areas after changing into their gear. But there are still some questions about…
-
Sarbanes-Oxley Criminal Whistleblower Provisions and the Workplace: More Than Just Securities Fraud
A law called the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was created to protect people who report fraudulent activity that could harm innocent investors. It was made in response to the Enron scandal. However, the law’s whistleblower rules can be interpreted to cover more than just fraud that affects shareholders. For example, even if a company is small and…
-
The U.S. Supreme Court Announces New Rule for First Amendment Free Speech Cases: Public Employee Whistle-blowers Need Not Apply
In 2006, the U.S. Supreme Court made a decision in the case of Garcetti v. Ceballos that will impact public employees across the country. The Court ruled that public employees can be disciplined for making statements about public matters as part of their job duties. In this case, a deputy district attorney, Ceballos, was disciplined…
-
Retaliation: Employers Had Better Watch Their Backs: Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Company v. White
Different courts had different standards for what constituted retaliation in employment cases. Some said it had to be a big change, like being fired or demoted, while others said it could be smaller, as long as it was meant to punish someone for speaking up. The Supreme Court wanted to fix this confusion. They wanted…
-
Successor Liability Issues in Labor and Employment Cases
In the 21st century, when companies merge or sell their business, it can affect the people who work there. Employment lawyers have to study when a new company might be responsible for treating employees fairly. A famous court case in 1973 set the rules for this. It said that if a new company buys a…
-
The Impact of Recent NLRB Decisions on Supervisory Status
A legal firm is being sued for not paying their employees enough. The employees claim they were not paid for their overtime work. The lawsuit is being taken to court, and both sides will have to prove their case. In 1935, Congress passed a law called the NLRA to protect industrial workers’ rights. However, in…
-
Coverage of the Fair Labor Standards Act: What Connection with Commerce Brings an Employee Within the Coverage of the Fair Labor Standards Act? Part I
If you work in a job that involves selling things, making things for sale, or working for a business that sells things, you have to be paid at least the minimum wage. If you work more than 40 hours in a week, you have to be paid extra for those extra hours. This applies to…
-
Coverage of the Fair Labor Standards Act:What Connection with Commerce Brings an Employee within the Coverage of the Fair Labor Standards Act?, Part 2
The article discusses how the FLSA was expanded in 1961 to cover all employees of a business engaged in commerce, even if some employees are not directly involved in commerce. It also talks about further expansion in 1974. The 1961 amendments to the FLSA had a definition of enterprise that included employers whose employees worked…
-
Family Responsibility Discrimination: The EEOC Weighs in on Unlawful Disparate Treatment of Workers with Caregiving Responsibilities
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) issued guidelines in 2007 to address discrimination against workers with caregiving responsibilities. These guidelines are used by EEOC offices and can be influential in court cases involving discrimination against caregivers. Although being a caregiver is not a protected category under the law, the guidelines aim to prevent unfair treatment…