Author: Elf
-
Rule or No Rule? An Examination of Recent Unadopted Rule Challenge Decisions
In Florida, agencies have to follow certain rules when making new policies. If they don’t follow the rules, someone who is affected by the new policy can challenge it. But first, they have to prove that the new policy is not following the right rules. An unadopted rule is a statement from a government agency…
-
The Florida Public Records Act in the Era of Modern Technology
Florida is known as the Sunshine State because of its great weather and beautiful beaches. The âGovernment-in-the-Sunshineâ laws in Florida promote open government meetings and records. This means that government actions and records are supposed to be open to the public. However, with modern technology, there are new issues to consider with public records laws.…
-
Bid Protests Under the Administrative Procedure Act: The Standard of Review, the Protest Hearing, and Further Review
The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) in Florida helps to keep the government’s powers in check by making sure that public agencies follow the rules when making decisions. It also allows citizens to challenge those decisions if they seem unfair. When it comes to bid protests, the APA sets out the procedures for how purchasing contracts…
-
Misled Interested Citizens and Florida’s Public Meeting Laws
In Florida, the Government in the Sunshine Law makes it so that public meetings must be open to the public. In 2013, a rule was added that says the public must be given a chance to speak at these meetings. But it’s not clear what “reasonable” means in terms of how much time the public…
-
What Are the Constitutional Limitations on Prayers at Local Government Meetings?
The U.S. Supreme Court said that local governments can start their meetings with religious prayers, but there are some limits. Lower courts have also said that local governments need to make sure different religions have a chance to participate in the prayer-giving. The Supreme Court has ruled that it is okay for local government meetings…
-
Firefighter Cancer Benefits: A Case for Prospective Application
In 2019, Florida passed a law giving benefits to firefighters diagnosed with certain types of cancer. A recent court decision awarded benefits to a firefighter diagnosed before the law took effect. This has caused local governments to defend their policies of only giving benefits for diagnoses after the law’s effective date. A study found that…
-
The Foreclosure of Local Special Assessment Liens: What, Where, Why, and How of the Civil Action and Enforcement Methods
In these difficult times, local governments are struggling to collect money. This article explains the rules and steps for a local government to take action against property owners who haven’t paid special assessments. It covers things like giving notice to the property owner, when to file a lawsuit, and what happens after the court makes…
-
Aircraft Lien Law
The laws governing aviation liens in Florida are very confusing and complicated. There are different statutes to follow, and federal laws also play a role. It’s unclear whether a repairman’s right to claim a lien is affected if they let go of the aircraft before filing the lien. A court case tried to answer this,…
-
Welcome to the Hotel St. Moritz: A Warning Concerning the Window in Which to Seek Appellate Review of Corrected, Amended, or Modified Orders
If you don’t appeal a bad decision within 30 days, you might not get another chance. Sometimes, the deadline to appeal can be confusing, especially if the decision has been changed. It’s important to know the rules and get help from a specialist if you’re not sure. If you miss the deadline, you could lose…
-
When Is a Motion for Rehearing Necessary to Preserve for Review a Trial Court’s Error in Failing to Make Factual Findings?
Appellate courts will only consider issues on appeal if they were first brought up in the trial court. This means that if something wasn’t discussed in the trial court, it can’t be brought up on appeal unless it’s a really big mistake, like the court not having the power to make a decision, or someone…
-
Restraining Justice: How Florida Can Better Aid Pro Se Survivors of Domestic Violence with Appeals of Injunction for Protection Cases
Lawyers have a special license to practice law, but they also have a duty to provide legal help to those who can’t afford it. Domestic violence is a big problem in Florida, with a lot of cases going unreported. Many survivors of domestic violence don’t have the money to hire a lawyer to help them…
-
How to Lose a Judicial Law Clerk in 10 Ways
Sometimes when you submit a long legal document, it’s easy for someone to get bored and miss important points. It’s a good idea to get someone else to read it and make edits to make sure it’s clear and to the point. When it comes to replying to someone else’s legal argument, it’s best not…
-
Inconsistent, Inadequate, Unbalanced, and Compromised: Breaking Up with Flawed Verdicts
Sometimes jury verdicts don’t make sense and can be challenged by the losing party. There are four common types of irregular verdicts: compromises, inconsistent, inadequate, or against the weight of the evidence. Inconsistent verdicts are when the jury makes two simultaneous determinations that can’t be reconciled, and it’s important for the legal system to address…
-
Is It Over Yet? A Primer on Federal and State Appellate Finality Doctrines
In court cases, lawyers have to figure out if a dismissal or summary judgment order is final and can be appealed. This is a complicated process because federal and state courts have different rules for what makes an order final and appealable. The rules sound similar, but they lead to different results in practice. For…
-
Not a Foregone Conclusion: The Importance of Advocating for a Favorable Remand Instruction in a Civil Appeal from a Final Judgment
You won the appeal for your client, but the trial judge didn’t give the outcome you expected. Even though the appellate court didn’t order a new trial, the trial judge made the same decision using the correct burden of proof. This outcome could have been prevented by paying more attention to advocating for a specific…
-
District Court Review of Mandamus Proceedings in Land-Use Litigation: Certiorari or Appeal?
You represent a real estate developer who was denied approval for a project by the local government. You challenged this decision in court, but the circuit court also denied your request. Now, you need to decide whether to appeal the circuit court’s decision in the district court or file a petition for certiorari. If you…
-
New Pro Bono Program Aims to Reframe the Way Domestic Violence Injunction Opinions Are Written
In the court, judges write the history of legal cases. When victims of domestic violence appeal their injunction cases, the court often doesn’t write down the reasons for affirming the decision. This means there’s no clear legal basis for similar cases in the future. Groups in Florida are working to help victims appeal their cases…
-
When Bankruptcy Appeals Attack: Refining the Flexible Approach to Finality in Bankruptcy Proceedings
Six years ago, an article in a legal journal called bankruptcy appeals the “ninjas of the appellate world.” It means they come out of nowhere and have different rules and standards. Since then, the U.S. Supreme Court has made two important decisions about which orders in bankruptcy cases can be appealed. Some lower courts have…
-
The Preservation of Error During Voir Dire
Voir dire is the process of questioning potential jurors to ensure they are impartial. As courts start to reopen after the pandemic, it’s important to remember how to protect the right to choose an impartial jury. This means raising any concerns about potential jurors during the trial, so that the court has a chance to…
-
Zooming In on the Impact Florida’s Remote Civil Jury Trials May Have on Appellate Standards of Review
Appellate standards of review are the way an appeals court looks at a lower court’s decisions. They usually give deference to the lower court because it saw everything happen in person. But now, with the pandemic, some courts are trying out remote trials with video recordings. This could change how much deference the appeals court…
-
En Banc Hearings, By the Numbers
In 2019, Florida’s appellate courts issued 12,208 opinions. In the past, they have issued up to 26,800 cases with an average of 24,700 cases per year. Each district court of appeal has a certain number of judges, which means there are a lot of different three-judge panels possible. Since 1982, the appellate courts have only…
-
Forum Selection in Administrative Appeals and the Home Venue Privilege
Sometimes, lawyers have to decide which court to appeal a case to, especially when dealing with administrative agencies like the St. Johns River Water Management District and the Southwest Florida Water Management District. In 2018, three appeals were filed in the Fifth District against the Florida Housing Finance Corporation, even though the agency is based…
-
A Primer on Florida’s New Summary Judgment Standard
The Florida Rules of Civil Procedure were changed to make it easier to get a summary judgment in court. This means that a party can ask the judge to decide the case without a trial if there are no important facts in dispute. Florida adopted the same standard as the federal courts, which makes it…
-
A Practical Guide to the Amendments to the Florida Appellate Rules of Procedure
The Florida Supreme Court made new rules in December 2020 for how appellate documents should be written and filed. They want documents to be easier to read and access on computers. They also changed the font types and set word limits for documents. They made a new rule called Rule 9.045 for these requirements, and…