Category: Florida BAR article
-
Valuing Economic Damages in Employment Litigation from a Plaintiff’s Perspective, Part I
Valuing economic damages in Title VII cases is more difficult than other types of cases like personal injury or breach of contract. In Title VII cases, there is a seniority-based benefits loss component that is unique and cannot be recovered with new employment. This makes it a permanent loss. Expert testimony is often excluded in…
-
Time Limitations and Court Supervision in Class Actions Under the FLSA and the ADEA
Basically, when someone files a lawsuit, they might think that the time limit for the lawsuit is paused. But for certain laws like the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), this might not be true. If the lawsuit is on behalf of other people too, the time limit…
-
Digital Age Defamation: Free Speech v. Freedom from Responsibility on the Internet
Disgruntled employees have always made damaging comments about their companies, and in the past, the companies could sue for defamation. But now, with the internet, people can make false claims anonymously. It’s easy to sue someone you can find and serve with legal papers, but what do you do when the person spreading lies about…
-
11th Circuit Clarifies Burden in Failure-to-Promote Cases
In a case called Lee v. GTE Florida, Inc., a court said that in order to prove that a company didn’t promote someone for unfair reasons, the person who wasn’t promoted has to show that they were clearly more qualified than the person who was promoted. In this case, Lee worked at GTE for a…
-
Physician Unionization: A Primer and Prescription
In 1975, anesthesiologists in San Francisco protested high malpractice premiums by refusing to assist in elective surgeries for four weeks. This led to half of the hospital beds in the city emptying and significant financial losses for hospitals. This resulted in legislation capping damage awards to medical malpractice plaintiffs in California. After the introduction of…
-
Limited the Use of âMe Tooâ Evidence in Employment Discrimination Case
During the last few years, the job market in the US was really good, with low unemployment and higher wages. But even with all that, there were more cases of people filing complaints about being treated unfairly at work. Now, the economy is starting to not do as well, and more people are losing their…
-
The Beauty and the Beast in the Workplace: Appearance-based Discrimination Claims Under EEO Laws
In today’s world, how you look matters. People care a lot about appearance and it can affect your success. Studies show that attractive people are assumed to be smarter, more capable, and have more opportunities. Employers know that good-looking employees can help make sales and close deals. So, it’s important to look professional and put…
-
National Labor Relations Board: Nonunionized Employees Have a Right to Bring a Coworker to Discipline
In a recent case, the N.L.R.B. decided that nonunion workers have the right to have a coworker with them in meetings that could lead to them getting in trouble. This is a big change from the past. The case was brought by two employees from the Epilepsy Foundation who said they were fired for criticizing…
-
The Court Clarifies a Discrimination Plaintiff’s Evidentiary Burden in Order to Avoid Judgment
In 2000, the Supreme Court made a decision in a case called Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products. The decision helped make it easier for employees who believe they have been discriminated against to prove their case in court. This decision changed the way lower courts had been handling these cases and made it easier for…
-
Preparing the Workplace for a Pandemic
Florida employers need to prepare for possible pandemics like avian influenza, SARS, or bioterrorism by taking steps to ensure their workplaces are safe. The risk of a pandemic illness is significant enough to warrant the time and resources needed to keep business operations running. Employers should promote quarantine effectiveness, social distancing, and preventative hygiene to…
-
Employment Verification: Then and Wow!
ICE is cracking down on businesses for immigration violations, like not having the right paperwork for employees. They’re making big arrests and fines, causing chaos and panic. This is happening in different states, and it’s a big deal. In 2008, five managers of IFCO Systems North America were charged with hiring and harboring illegal immigrants.…
-
Availability of Class Actions in Arbitration, Part 2
Part one of this article looked at the reasons for and against class action lawsuits and arbitration in legal cases. It found that arbitration agreements are usually upheld, but there are exceptions for cases with very small amounts of money at stake. Part two will look at more cases where waivers were upheld, how courts…
-
Availability of Class Actions in Arbitration, Part 1
Some rights given by law can’t be given up, even if someone agrees to give them up. The Supreme Court said that the law to protect workers from low wages can’t be waived. This means that workers can’t agree to not get the wages they’re supposed to. The Supreme Court also said that workers can’t…
-
Business Is Business: Recognizing Referral Relationships as Legitimate Business Interests Protectable by Restrictive Covenants in Florida
Your client built a successful medical equipment business by earning the trust of doctors who referred patients to his company. He hired a trusted employee to help with the referrals, but she left and started her own competing business. She used the information she had about the doctors’ preferences to win them over. Now, the…
-
Family Responsibility Discrimination: The EEOC Weighs in on Unlawful Disparate Treatment of Workers with Caregiving Responsibilities
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) issued guidelines in 2007 to address discrimination against workers with caregiving responsibilities. These guidelines are used by EEOC offices and can be influential in court cases involving discrimination against caregivers. Although being a caregiver is not a protected category under the law, the guidelines aim to prevent unfair treatment…
-
Coverage of the Fair Labor Standards Act:What Connection with Commerce Brings an Employee within the Coverage of the Fair Labor Standards Act?, Part 2
The article discusses how the FLSA was expanded in 1961 to cover all employees of a business engaged in commerce, even if some employees are not directly involved in commerce. It also talks about further expansion in 1974. The 1961 amendments to the FLSA had a definition of enterprise that included employers whose employees worked…
-
Coverage of the Fair Labor Standards Act: What Connection with Commerce Brings an Employee Within the Coverage of the Fair Labor Standards Act? Part I
If you work in a job that involves selling things, making things for sale, or working for a business that sells things, you have to be paid at least the minimum wage. If you work more than 40 hours in a week, you have to be paid extra for those extra hours. This applies to…
-
The Impact of Recent NLRB Decisions on Supervisory Status
A legal firm is being sued for not paying their employees enough. The employees claim they were not paid for their overtime work. The lawsuit is being taken to court, and both sides will have to prove their case. In 1935, Congress passed a law called the NLRA to protect industrial workers’ rights. However, in…
-
Successor Liability Issues in Labor and Employment Cases
In the 21st century, when companies merge or sell their business, it can affect the people who work there. Employment lawyers have to study when a new company might be responsible for treating employees fairly. A famous court case in 1973 set the rules for this. It said that if a new company buys a…
-
Retaliation: Employers Had Better Watch Their Backs: Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Company v. White
Different courts had different standards for what constituted retaliation in employment cases. Some said it had to be a big change, like being fired or demoted, while others said it could be smaller, as long as it was meant to punish someone for speaking up. The Supreme Court wanted to fix this confusion. They wanted…
-
The U.S. Supreme Court Announces New Rule for First Amendment Free Speech Cases: Public Employee Whistle-blowers Need Not Apply
In 2006, the U.S. Supreme Court made a decision in the case of Garcetti v. Ceballos that will impact public employees across the country. The Court ruled that public employees can be disciplined for making statements about public matters as part of their job duties. In this case, a deputy district attorney, Ceballos, was disciplined…
-
Sarbanes-Oxley Criminal Whistleblower Provisions and the Workplace: More Than Just Securities Fraud
A law called the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was created to protect people who report fraudulent activity that could harm innocent investors. It was made in response to the Enron scandal. However, the law’s whistleblower rules can be interpreted to cover more than just fraud that affects shareholders. For example, even if a company is small and…
-
IBP v. Alvarez
The U.S. Supreme Court recently decided that employees must be paid for the time they spend putting on and taking off protective gear at work. They also have to be paid for the time they spend walking to and from their work areas after changing into their gear. But there are still some questions about…
-
Faragher v. City of Boca Raton: A Seven-year Retrospective
The Faragher defense is a way for employers to avoid being held responsible for discrimination by their employees. In order to use this defense, the employer has to prove that they had a good system in place to prevent discrimination and that the employee didn’t take advantage of it. Even though some people were worried…