Category: Florida BAR article
-
Padi-Waggin: The Tail of One Dog’s Journey from Death Row to Legislative Inspiration for Dog Bite Due Process
A veterinarian adopted a dog named Padi, who was abused and left with an embedded collar. One day, the dog bit a boy’s ear when he tried to play with him at the veterinarian’s office. The incident led to a legal case that lasted a year. After much concern from the community and involvement of…
-
AWA Compliance: Understanding the Basic Framework
The Animal Welfare Act (AWA) is a federal law that sets standards for the humane care and treatment of certain animals in places like zoos and research labs. The law is enforced by the U.S. Department of Agriculture through inspections and investigations. It doesn’t cover farm animals or certain animals used in research. The goal…
-
What the Textualist Revolution in Florida Jurisprudence Means for Practitioners
In Florida, judges are big on looking at the exact words of the law when making their decisions. This is called textualism, and it’s a really important thing to know about if you’re a lawyer practicing in Florida. There’s a famous book called Reading Law that explains textualism in detail, and it’s been cited a…
-
Navigating the Differences in Circuit Court Appellate Jurisdiction for Nonfinal Orders
This article talks about the differences in jurisdiction between district courts, Florida Supreme Court, and circuit courts, especially when it comes to reviewing non-final orders from county courts. It’s important for attorneys to understand these differences when seeking review of decisions. The District Courts of Appeal and Circuit Courts have the power to review decisions…
-
Raise Your Standards: A Practitioner’s Guide to the Effective Use of Appellate Standards of Review
It’s important for people involved in a legal case to understand the standard of review that will be used when their case goes to an appeals court. This standard of review determines how much the appeals court will consider the lower court’s decision. There are three categories of decisions that a trial court can make:…
-
To Err is Human, But the Tipsy Coachman Rule Can Get the Trial Judge Home
Florida appellate courts are supposed to correct errors, but sometimes they might not if they think the error didn’t really affect the outcome, or if they affirm a decision even though there was a mistake because they think the result is still the right one. This is called the “tipsy coachman” rule, which comes from…
-
Preserving Claims of Error in Florida Federal and State Civil Actions: Some Common Rules
In Florida federal and state courts, both civil and criminal jury trials have a rule that says if you want to complain about something that happened in the trial, you need to speak up right away. If you don’t, the appellate court will only consider it if it was a really big mistake. So, it’s…
-
No Time Like the Present: The Right to Immediate Appeal of Orders Addressing Workers’ Compensation Immunity
In workers’ comp cases, if a court denies the defendant’s right to immunity, they can immediately appeal. This right allows them to challenge the decision before the case is finished. It’s important to understand the purpose and history of this right, as well as the types of orders that can be appealed. The workers’ compensation…
-
Same, Similar, and Everything in Between: Appellate Courts’ Review of the Same-Specialty Requirement for Presuit Experts in Medical Malpractice Cases
Florida’s medical malpractice presuit process aims to prevent unsupported lawsuits from going to court. Before filing a lawsuit, the plaintiff must get an expert’s opinion supporting their malpractice claim. Meeting these requirements is a must before suing. Defendants often challenge the expert’s qualifications in court. The law on this issue has changed over time, and…
-
Adjudication of Disputed Issues of Fact Under the APA
Mr. Jones applied for a license to operate widgets in Florida, but the Board of Widgets denied his application because he had negligence cases filed against him and had disciplinary action taken in another state. He tried to convince the board that he could operate widgets safely, but they still denied his application. The board…
-
Rule-challenge Standing After NAACP, Inc. v. Florida Board of Regents
To challenge a rule or proposed rule in Florida, you have to prove that you will be directly affected by it. This means showing that the rule will cause you a real and immediate injury, and that your interest is related to the rule. If you’re part of a group challenging the rule, you also…
-
The Evolution of Declaratory Statements
The Florida Administrative Procedure Act allows people to ask for a declaratory statement from a state agency to get guidance on how a regulation applies to their specific situation. But there have been some changes that make it unclear who can ask for a declaratory statement and what it can cover. So right now, it’s…
-
The Evolution of Declaratory Statements
The Florida Administrative Procedure Act allows people to request a declaratory statement from a state agency if they need guidance on how a regulation applies to their situation. But, there have been recent changes that are causing confusion for everyone involved. It’s unclear who can request a declaratory statement and what it can be used…
-
The 2003 Amendments to the Florida APA
A new law in Florida, CS/CS/SB 1584, was passed to make administrative hearings faster and address recent court decisions. It doesn’t change who can request a hearing, but it does clarify the reasons for challenging rules. This is similar to past bills but with some changes. In simple terms, a new bill is changing the…
-
Agency Substantive Jurisdiction: The More Things Change . . .
Two recent court decisions in Florida have raised questions about the power of government agencies to change or reject legal decisions. The first case, Barfield v. Department of Health, dealt with the Board of Dentistry’s ability to change a ruling on the admissibility of evidence in a dental case. The court said the agency did…
-
Conflicts Between the Sunshine Law and Trade Secret Protection in Public Procurement
Public officials have a duty to conduct meetings in the open. But sometimes they need to discuss private business information, like trade secrets, with vendors. This creates a conflict between being open and protecting these secrets. As the government does more business with private companies, this conflict becomes more important to resolve. When companies want…
-
The Administrative Process and Constitutional Principles: Separation of Powers
The separation of powers is a basic rule that divides the government’s power into three parts: the people who make the laws, the people who enforce the laws, and the people who interpret the laws. This division stops one group from having too much power. It also stops the legislature from giving its powers to…
-
The Florida Division of Administrative Hearings
In Florida, there’s a government organization called the Division of Administrative Hearings that helps resolve disputes between people and government agencies. It’s important for making sure everyone gets a fair chance to be heard. It’s not always the fastest way to solve problems, but it’s necessary to keep the government from becoming too powerful. This…
-
Why Florida Needs the Administrative Procedure Act
In Florida, decisions made by government agencies have a big impact on our daily lives. These agencies make decisions on things like where new buildings can be built, how much we pay for electricity, and where new roads and schools are located. This has been happening more and more over the past 50 years because…
-
After the 1999 Amendments to Administrative Procedure Act, One Aspect of Consolidated-Tomoka Still R
The Florida Legislature and courts have been arguing about how much power government agencies should have to make rules. The Legislature limited agency rulemaking power in 1996 and 1999, but recent court decisions suggest that agencies should have more freedom. The 1996 change said that agencies can only make rules that relate to their specific…
-
What Is a Bad Faith Administrative Petition
The recent decision in Friends of Nassau County, Inc., v. Nassau County addressed what constitutes a bad faith or frivolous administrative petition under the Florida Administrative Procedure Act. The court debated whether to use an objective or subjective analysis to determine if a petition was brought for an improper purpose. The current Florida APA has…
-
The Florida Board of Bar Examiners: The Use of and Rehabilitation at Formal Hearings
You finished two years of law school and are applying to join The Florida Bar. However, you have to disclose some not-so-great things on your application, like misdemeanor convictions and financial problems. You need to be honest about these issues and may have to attend a hearing to explain everything. After the hearing, the board…
-
The Expanded Availability of Declaratory Statements
Declaratory judgments are a way for lawyers to clarify their client’s rights in court without a full trial. This can save time and money. But there’s a similar tool for when a client’s rights are decided by a state agency. It’s called a declaratory statement. A recent Florida court decision will make it easier to…
-
Equitable Tolling in Florida Administrative Proceedings
Equitable tolling in administrative law allows a person to file a claim even if they missed the deadline because they didn’t know about it or were prevented from filing on time. In Florida, this doctrine has been applied when a person was misled or prevented from asserting their rights. In a specific case, a person…