1. The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida ruled that in order to engage in protected conduct under the False Claims Act, a plaintiff must specifically suspect that their employer has made a false claim for payment to the federal government.
2. The court granted summary judgment in favor of the employer as the plaintiff did not engage in protected activity under the False Claims Act, as his emails did not reference any submission of false claims for payment to the government.
3. The court found that the termination decision predated the emails, and the plaintiff could not show that these emails were the basis for his termination. 1. The ruling states that “protected activity” under the False Claims Act only includes objections to false claims for payment to the federal government.
2. The definition of “protected activity” for the purposes of the FCA is narrow and does not encompass all objections related to false claims.
3. The ruling confirms that objections to false claims for payment to the federal government are the only type of activity protected under the False Claims Act.
https://www.proskauer.com/blog/florida-district-court-limits-scope-of-protected-activity-under-the-fca
Leave a Reply