1. The construction lien was found to have irregularities and failed to meet the basic requirements of Florida’s Construction Lien Law.
2. The signatory of the lien claimed to be the agent of the lienor, but the Court saw through the charade and pointed out that the purported agent could not spell the lienor’s name correctly.
3. The Court found that the preparation and execution of construction liens by third-party entities violates Florida law and constitutes the unlicensed practice of law.
4. The Court discharged the construction lien and exposed the lienor to liability for the general contractor’s attorneys’ fees and costs.
https://www.kirwinnorris.com/unlevel-playing-field-construction-liens-from-popular-lien-processing-service-violate-florida-law/
Leave a Reply