1. Eating a healthy diet can lower the risk of chronic diseases.
2. Regular exercise can improve overall physical and mental health.
3. Smoking increases the risk of developing lung cancer.
4. Getting enough sleep is important for overall well-being.
5. Drinking alcohol in moderation may have some health benefits. – The plaintiff must state the amount of debt that is due and provide reasons to believe that one or more of the grounds in § 76.04, Florida Statutes are present, specifically stating the grounds under §76.04.
– The affidavit must not be based on hearsay or the plaintiff’s subjective beliefs, but rather must be based on the plaintiff’s personal knowledge of the defendant’s actions.
– In the affidavit, the plaintiff must provide proof that the debtor intends to hide his assets, which is why parties do not file prejudgment writs in every case in order to ensure protection of potential assets. – The motion must state the amount of the debt, that it is an existing debt, and one or more of the grounds in §76.05, Fla. Stat.
– There are thirteen grounds available in § 76.04, Fla. Stat. that a plaintiff can show in its affidavit for a prejudgment writ of attachment.
– When a debt is not due, there are only three grounds proscribed by §76.05 that a plaintiff must show in its affidavit. 1. The plaintiff must post a bond payable to the defendant in at least double the debt demanded as security when attaching prejudgment to a debtor’s property.
2. The bond is meant to provide security for debtors against overzealous collectors and prevent improper attachment.
3. Once the writ is executed, the defendant may also post a bond to restore possession of their attached property, which is conditioned for the forthcoming of the property restored to abide the final order of the court. 1. A defendant/debtor can file a responsive motion to dissolve the prejudgment writ of attachment.
2. The response will be scheduled for an immediate hearing and may attack the sufficiency of the plaintiff’s grounds alleged.
3. If the debtor disputes the plaintiff’s allegations, the issue may be tried in front of a jury.
4. If the writ is dissolved by the court, the plaintiff can still prosecute the action to a final judgment.
5. Plaintiffs must carefully consider the pros and cons of the prejudgment writ of attachment before filing the motion and affidavit with the court. – A prevailing defendant is entitled to recover against the bond in Florida Transportation Co. v. Dixie Sightseeing Tours, Inc., 139 So.2d 175 (Fla.3d DCA 1962).
– Section 76.18 of the Florida Statutes is relevant to the issue.
– Section 76.24(1) of the Florida Statutes outlines specific provisions.
– In Frasher, 813 So.2d at 1019, certain legal principles were discussed.
– Section 76.24(2) of the Florida Statutes, as well as case law (Nelson v. Hall, 63. So. 156, 156 (Fla. 1913)), supports the right to a jury trial in certain situations.
– Florida Jurisprudence and case law (Southern Nat. Bank of Fort Walton Beach v. Young, 142 So. 2d 788 (Fla 1st DCA 1962)) provide additional insights into creditors’ rights.
– Section 76.25 of the Florida Statutes is also relevant to the discussion.
https://www.jimersonfirm.com/blog/2019/09/prejudgment-writ-of-attachment-in-florida/
Leave a Reply