TIF is a way for Florida cities to bring in more tax money to help improve run-down areas. It works by using the extra taxes collected from improvements to pay for those improvements. Some people argue against TIF because of concerns about using eminent domain to take private property. One county in Florida has come up with a different way to fund redevelopment called the redevelopment capital program (RCP). TIF, or Tax Increment Financing, was created in the 1950s to help fund urban renewal projects when federal funding decreased. It generates money for things like road improvements, parks, and affordable housing. The goal of TIF is to revitalize neighborhoods and create partnerships between the public and private sectors. Florida’s laws aim to improve blighted areas and provide affordable housing. There was controversy over using eminent domain for TIF projects, but a Supreme Court decision in 2005 allowed it for economic development purposes. The Supreme Court said that states can have stricter rules for eminent domain than the federal government. In Florida, the definition of “blighted area” was considered too vague by some. A Florida court upheld the definition, saying it was not unconstitutionally vague. After the Kelo case, the Florida Legislature changed the law to make it much harder for local governments to take people’s property for economic development. They can now only take property for things like roads, parks, and other public uses. It’s also much harder for them to sell the property to private developers. A new amendment to the Florida Constitution makes it even harder for local governments to take property by eminent domain. Some people think these changes could make it harder to improve run-down areas in cities, but it’s too early to know for sure. A “Finding of Necessity” allows local governments in Florida to create a Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) to promote economic development in areas needing rehabilitation. The CRA can use Tax Increment Financing (TIF) to finance redevelopment projects within its jurisdiction. This TIF captures the increase in property tax revenues resulting from redevelopment and uses it to pay for public improvements. The value of real property in the CRA is determined based on a fixed date with a frozen base year assessed value. While TIF can be a valuable tool for redevelopment, there are arguments both for and against its use as a preferential choice for local government development. Arguments in Support of TIF:
1) TIF can help the entire community by boosting the economy and creating more jobs.
2) TIF can encourage private and public sectors to work together for economic development.
3) TIF has few financial risks and can support redevelopment projects without increasing taxes.
4) TIF uses loans to fund improvements in blighted areas that would otherwise not be funded.
5) TIF is not the only way to finance economic development and can work alongside other funding sources.
6) TIF can provide a consistent funding source for redevelopment projects.
Arguments in Opposition to TIF:
1) TIF uses taxes that could be used for public education.
2) Local government officials have the power to decide how TIF funds are used without public input.
3) The projected returns from TIF can be too optimistic and speculative.
4) Local government decisions on TIF may not be overturned by the courts, allowing for potential misuse of funds.
5) When TIF increases, other government units may need to raise taxes to cover their rising costs.
6) TIF uses public funds to support private sector development.
Redevelopment Capital Program:
The RCP is an alternative to TIF and uses non ad valorem funds for redevelopment projects.
The RCP was established to replace TIF, but it is not clear if it can do a better job.
Supporters of RCP believe it can accomplish more development and improve intergovernmental relations.
The adoption of RCP gives the county considerable power over redevelopment projects, which may cause delays and increased costs.
Conclusion:
Until it is shown that TIF is overly burdensome and cannot enhance economic development, TIF should continue to be the primary tool for local economic development. TIF is a way for local governments to fund redevelopment in urban areas. It’s been successful in Florida in turning blighted areas into thriving communities. It’s unclear if another tool called RCP is better than TIF. TIF is good for big projects, even though it ties up resources for a long time. It’s a reliable strategy for economic development. But new laws may affect its effectiveness. Overall, TIF can help communities improve and increase property tax revenue. Florida has laws called “Community Redevelopment Acts” that help improve areas in need of redevelopment. These laws allow for the creation of “Community Redevelopment Agencies” (CRAs) that can use tax money to help revitalize these areas. The CRAs can also use other funding sources like grants and private partnerships.
One key part of these laws is “Tax Increment Financing” (TIF), which allows CRAs to use the increase in property tax revenue from the redeveloped area to fund the improvements. The state government and local authorities have specific rules and regulations for how CRAs can use this money and what projects they can fund.
There have been some legal disputes about how property tax revenue should be calculated for TIF, as well as debates about using eminent domain to acquire land for redevelopment. In 2006, Florida also passed a constitutional amendment limiting the use of eminent domain for private purposes.
Overall, CRAs in Florida have been important in improving neighborhoods and promoting economic development in the state. Harry M. Hipler is a lawyer who practices in municipal and family law and commercial litigation. He received his law degree in 1975 and a Master of Laws in taxation in 1981. This information was provided by the Real Property, Probate and Trust Law Section.
Source: https://www.floridabar.org/the-florida-bar-journal/tax-increment-financing-in-florida-a-tool-for-local-government-revitalization-renewal-and-redevelopment/
Leave a Reply