When elected or appointed as a public official in Florida, there are many laws and rules to follow, including ethics and open government laws. If a public official is sued for not following these laws, there are some ways for the official to get their legal fees paid for by the government. In some cases, if an official is charged with breaking these laws and is found not guilty, the government can pay for their legal fees. There are also rules for the Commission on Ethics to decide whether or not to pay for a public official’s legal fees if someone falsely accuses them. However, the law does not specifically address paying for a public official’s legal fees in public records cases. But there are still ways for a public official to try to get their legal fees paid for if they win a public records case. If a government employee is sued for something they did while doing their job, the government may provide a lawyer to defend them. If the employee is found to have acted in bad faith or intentionally caused harm, the government can recover the lawyer fees from the employee. If the government doesn’t provide a lawyer and the employee wins the case, the government has to pay for the employee’s court costs and lawyer fees. If the government doesn’t have insurance, they can use funds to pay for any damages and lawyer fees from the lawsuit. If the employee intentionally caused harm, the government doesn’t have to pay for the damages. If a public official is sued for causing harm or damage and they win, the government may have to pay for their lawyer fees. But there are specific rules about when this can happen, so it’s important for the government’s legal team to carefully look at the situation before making a decision. The Public Records Act in Florida does not allow people to ask for money if they think their rights were violated. Instead, they can ask the court to say that their rights were violated, and to order the other side to follow the law in the future. They can also ask for their legal fees to be paid. The law says that if someone sues for money or because they were hurt, they can ask for their legal fees to be paid, but if someone sues under the Public Records Act, they can’t ask for their legal fees to be paid. This means that people who sue under the Public Records Act do not have the right to ask for their legal fees to be paid. If a government official is sued for not providing public records, they have to show they won the case in order to be considered the “prevailing party.” This can be challenging if they decide to settle the lawsuit instead of going to court. When a government official is sued and the lawsuit is eventually settled or dismissed, the official can be considered to have âprevailedâ and may be entitled to reimbursement for their attorney’s fees. This was shown in cases such as Sacks v. Rickles and State Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services v. Hall. In Thornber v. City of Ft. Walton Beach, city council members were also found to be prevailing parties and entitled to reimbursement for their attorneys’ fees after a civil rights lawsuit was settled. So, if a government official is sued and the case is resolved, they may be able to get their legal fees covered. In simple terms, in a court case, if a defendant pays most of the money they owe before the case is dismissed, they cannot claim to be the “winning” party and ask for their legal fees to be paid by the other side. The court will look at the details of the case to decide who actually won. In simple terms, the court usually sees the defendant as the winner when the plaintiff drops the case. However, in this case, the court needs to decide if the defendant really won because the plaintiff already paid most of what they owed before dropping the case. So, the defendant may not be considered the winner for the purpose of getting their legal fees paid. The court’s decision in the Padow case showed that simply dismissing a case does not always mean that the person who initiated the lawsuit is considered the “prevailing party” for the purpose of getting attorney’s fees. The court ruled that the substance of the outcome, not just the procedural actions, should determine who the prevailing party is. In a more recent case, the court further clarified that if both parties reach a settlement and the lawsuit is dismissed as a result, neither party can be considered the prevailing party for attorney’s fees. In simple terms, when a lawsuit is settled, the court looks at who got what they wanted in the end, not just who filed the lawsuit first. If a public official settles a lawsuit about public records instead of going to trial, they might not be considered the winner, especially if they have to pay the other side’s lawyers. This is important to know because it affects who has to pay for the legal fees in the end. In Florida, there are laws that limit delays in lawsuits, especially for public officials. The goal is to discourage unnecessary lawsuits and encourage settlements. If a public official is being sued, they can use taxpayer money to hire a lawyer, but the lawsuit has to be resolved in their favor for the legal fees to be paid by the public. The decision on whether the official can get their legal fees reimbursed is made by the agency’s lawyer. Government agencies have the power to decide whether or not to pay for the legal fees of public officials. The courts don’t have to make that decision. When officials ask for reimbursement, agencies need to carefully consider the facts and work with financial officials to make sure they’re not unlawfully using public money. In some cases, officials can be reimbursed for legal fees related to lawsuits about public records and meetings. It’s important to follow the law and communicate clearly to avoid legal disputes. These are citations to court cases in Florida, and they involve different legal issues. The cases involve disputes between government agencies and individuals. The citations also mention lawyers and legal associations.
Source: https://www.floridabar.org/the-florida-bar-journal/when-is-a-public-official-entitled-to-prevailing-party-attorneys-fee-reimbursement-in-public-records-act-cases-part-i/
Leave a Reply